Modules · Customer quality and problem solving

In use

QWorks Complaint

Manage the customer complaint from intake to verified closure.

Complaint intake, containment, 8D/CAPA, corrective action and effectiveness verification on the same case — every step with its owner, deadline and evidence.

CC-2026-000142D5D1D2D3D4D5D6D7D83dDueD3D4D5OKNOKNOK

QWorks Complaint in 30 seconds

What it manages, who uses it, what it connects.

What it manages

From customer complaint to evidenced closure

Intake, containment, root cause, corrective action, effectiveness verification and closure run in a single case chain.

Who uses it

The quality team and everyone who touches the case

Production, engineering, logistics, supplier quality and management work on the same case within their own responsibility.

What it connects

Methods and enterprise context

8D, CAPA, SCAR and root-cause methods, with customer, product and access context from ERP, MES, PLM, QMS and IAM.

  • Complaint
  • 8D
  • CAPA
  • RCA
  • Corrective Action
  • Effectiveness

See the Operation at Work

One complaint; from intake to audit-ready closure.

The demo case below advances through the operation on its own. At every step you see who worked, which decision was made and which state formed — an operation that runs, not a record. Hover to pause; click a step to jump.

LIVE CASESK-2026-000142
Complaint Intake
Quality · intake
Complaint Intake

The customer problem was opened with the right context: customer, location, product and the relevant standard/specification were related at the moment of intake, and priority was set.

CustomerAnonymised OEM
ProductRelated in context
StandardCustomer-specific requirement
PriorityHigh

Complaint features

What is specific to Complaint.

The following is QWorks Complaint’s own work. Shared mechanisms such as tasks, routing, deadlines and escalation come from the platform.

Complaint intake with context

Customer, product, lot/serial and warranty context are linked at the moment of intake.

Containment

Customer risk is limited before the root cause is known; the measure stays tied to the case.

8D / CAPA chain

8D is not a single form; it runs as a chain of steps, tasks, evidence and checkpoints.

Root cause analysis

With Ishikawa and 5 Whys, every root-cause candidate is eliminated with an OK/NOK decision.

Corrective action tracking

Every action has a defined owner, deadline and evidence expectation.

Effectiveness verification

A case does not close until the completed action is verified to prevent the problem.

Customer-specific response deadlines

Time targets are defined by case type and customer context.

Supplier-caused problems

The corrective action request sent to the supplier is tracked within the same case.

Customer templates and reports

Customer-specific 8D templates are produced as the output of the chain that was run.

Shared platform capabilities

The shared backbone beneath Complaint.

These capabilities are not specific to Complaint; they come with every business module. Start with Complaint and the lifecycle is in place from day one.

See how the platform is built

Business modules+ Platform vision

Shared platform capabilitiesIncluded with every module
  1. Work Orchestration
  2. SLA & Escalation
  3. Identity & Access
  4. Problem Solving
  5. Evidence
  6. Reporting
All capabilities
Enterprise contextERPMESPLMQMSIAM

Start with QWorks Complaint and every shared capability comes with it.Start with QWorks Audit and every shared capability comes with it.Start with QWorks Zero and every shared capability comes with it.

How it works

Each scene shows one mechanism.

The scenes below show, in simple form, how QWorks Complaint works. Under each we note what you are looking at and which risk it controls.

New recordCC-2026-000143CustomerOEM-AResp. dept.Assembly qualityPartBRK-2210Lot / serialL-2409-17WarrantyCoveredOwning teamAssembly quality
A record opened with contextWhat we seeCustomer, responsible department, product, lot/serial and warranty information are linked at intake.Risk it controlsA case opened with missing context going to the wrong team.
CC-2026-000142D5Casting surface defectD53dOwnerQuality engineerStepPermanent fixDue3 days left
Ownership and deadlineWhat we seeWho holds the record, which step it is at and when it must close.Risk it controlsWork left unowned or quietly running late.
D1TeamD2ProblemD3ContainmentD4Root causeD5Permanent fixD6ImplementD7PreventD8Closure4/8ClosureD5–D8 open
8D step by stepWhat we seeThe status of each of the eight 8D steps on a single rail.Risk it controlsClosure with a skipped or missing step.
ManMachineMethodMaterialMeasurementEnvironmentNOKNOKOKNOKNOKNOKVerified
Structured root cause analysisWhat we seeThe OK/NOK decision on every candidate cause across Ishikawa / 6M categories, on the case itself.Risk it controlsClosure with an unverified root cause.
CC-2026-000142D5Casting surface defectTaskOwnerDueSourceSort the shipmentD3LogisticsDoneVerify the root causeD4Engineering1d lateApply die maintenanceD5Production3dUpdate the control planD7Quality9dCC-2026-000142D5Casting surface defectSort the shipmentDoneD3LogisticsVerify the root cause1d lateD4EngineeringApply die maintenance3dD5ProductionUpdate the control plan9dD7Quality
Every task under its caseWhat we seeAll system-opened and manually opened tasks, under the case they came from, with delays and deadlines visible.Risk it controlsWork drifting away from the case into e-mail and lists.

Scenes are conceptual; record numbers and values are representative. We can walk through the real interface together in an evaluation call.

Roles

One case, different responsibilities.

Everyone sees only their own work and permissions; the case stays single.

  • QualityOpens the case, runs the method, approves closure.
  • ProductionOwns containment and actions on the shop floor.
  • EngineeringMakes the technical call on root cause and permanent fix.
  • LogisticsRuns stock, shipment and sorting steps.
  • SupplierEvidences corrective action on problems it caused.
  • ManagementSees late and rising-risk cases through escalation.

Where the Context Comes From

A complaint does not open without context.

Master data ownership stays with the source system; Complaint uses the context it needs through integration, reference or a controlled snapshot. The moment a case opens, customer, product, lot and authorisation context falls into place.

Review the integration approach
ERPCustomer, order and shipment context
MESProduction and operation data
PLMProduct and revision structure
QMS · DMSRecords, documents and compliance
IAMIdentity, role and access security

The Value It Delivers

Not more data; manageable action and lasting improvement.

The purpose of QWorks Complaint is not to collect more records but to turn existing quality data into controlled operation, evidence and organisational learning.

A more controlled operation

Complaint, task, action, owner and deadline are managed in one chain rather than in scattered tools.

An audit-ready trail

Decision, approval, action, evidence and closure rationale are not collected afterwards; they are recorded within the process.

Faster intervention

Critical, late or unowned work becomes visible early; escalation rises by rule and intervention is not delayed.

Organisational learning

Solution knowledge does not stay in one person’s memory; fed back to the standard, it becomes knowledge usable in future cases.

Frequently Asked

First questions about the complaint and 8D operation.

The six questions quality teams ask most often before a demo.

Can we use our own 8D form and customer templates?

Yes. QWorks runs 8D not as a single fixed form but as a chain of steps, tasks, evidence and control points. Customer-specific template and reporting needs are handled as outputs of that chain.

How does it manage response deadlines that vary by customer?

Time targets are defined by case type and customer context. Work that is late or rising in risk does not wait silently; it moves to the right management level by defined rule.

Do supplier-sourced problems run in the same structure?

A customer complaint and the corrective action request sent to a supplier are related in the same case context, so inbound and outbound quality work is tracked in one chain.

Does the case close when it is marked “completed”?

No. Completing an action and it being effective are separate steps. A case does not close finally until the permanent action is verified to prevent the problem.

Will collecting evidence during an audit still be a separate preparation exercise?

Decision, approval, action, evidence and closure rationale are not compiled afterwards; they are recorded while the process runs. Audit evidence is a natural output of the operation.

Is it used only by the quality team?

No. Production, engineering, logistics, laboratory, supplier quality, sales and management work on the same case according to their responsibilities; everyone sees only their own work and permissions.

Let’s look at Complaint through one of your own complaints.

Tell us about a recent complaint and we will structure the same case in QWorks together. You do not need to share sensitive information.