QWorks Platform

Different quality processes.One working discipline.

QWorks runs Complaint, Audit and future business modules on the same backbone of work, due dates, evidence, access and decisions.

QWorks operations backbone

  1. OwnershipCase team and owner assigned.PlanProgramme, scope and auditor.RiskFailure mode and effect.PlanPhase and gate plan.RequirementLevel and file list.
  2. Due dateEvery 8D step runs on time.FindingRecorded with owner and evidence.AnalysisSeverity, occurrence, detection.DesignProduct and process outputs.FileDocuments and evidence gathered.
  3. EvidenceRoot cause decided OK/NOK.ActionBecomes work with a due date.ActionOwned preventive work.ValidationTrial run and measurement.ReviewGaps and deviations visible.
  4. EscalationThe right level steps in on delay.VerificationClosure approved on evidence.LearningCarried into the next design.ApprovalPhase-gate decision.ApprovalCustomer decision on record.
QWorks Complaint · In useQWorks Audit · In developmentFMEA · Platform visionAPQP · Platform visionPPAP · Platform visionThe module changes. The working discipline does not.

How does the platform fit together?

Modules use the same backbone; the backbone works on the context of your existing enterprise systems.

Work OrchestrationMakes work owned, time-bound and explicit about its dependencies.All capabilities →

The same working discipline
beneath every module.

Business modules do not behave like separate applications. Shared platform capabilities come with every module; the lifecycle is in place even with one module.

Shared platform capability

Work Orchestration

Makes work owned, time-bound and explicit about its dependencies.

This capability works the same way in Complaint, Audit, Zero and future modules.

One backbone, three modules

A complaint, a finding and an AI proposal become the same work.

Here is the proof of the platform claim: a case in Complaint, a finding in Audit and an approved Zero proposal land in the same work list, under the same ownership, due-date, evidence and permission rules.

ComplaintIn useCC-2026-000142Customer complaint · D5AuditIn developmentAUD-2026-0031Audit finding · F1ZeroIn developmentProposed actionWith user approvalQWorks shared backboneWorkDue dateEvidencePermissionsAudit trailOne work listApply die maintenanceComplaint · D5Production3dComplete the die maintenance recordAudit · F1Process owner7dEscalation for three casesZero · approvedQuality manager2dComplaintIn useCC-2026-000142Customer complaint · D5AuditIn developmentAUD-2026-0031Audit finding · F1ZeroIn developmentProposed actionWith user approvalQWorks shared backboneWorkDue dateEvidencePermissionsAudit trailOne work listApply die maintenance3dComplaint · D5ProductionComplete the die maintenance record7dAudit · F1Process ownerEscalation for three cases2dZero · approvedQuality manager
  1. One work modelWhichever module it comes from, work appears in the same list with its owner and due date.
  2. One evidence trailEvidence, approvals and change history are recorded the same way in every module.
  3. One permission modelUsers, roles and the organisation model are set up once; every module uses them.

From separate tools
to a shared quality operation.

Separate tools

  • Separate records
  • Separate task tracking
  • Separate user and role logic
  • Separate evidence chain

QWorks Platform

  • Shared operations backbone
  • Shared ownership
  • Execution based on shared controls
  • A connected quality lifecycle

Start with your priority quality process.

Let’s review your existing systems and quality operation together and define the first QWorks scope.